Case study · Industrial sites · Adelaide Two industrial sites,scored, not assumed.
JC inspects its own work. In May 2026 two industrial sites were scored area by area, and every gap was written down with what happens next.
4.9 from 59 Google reviewsWe reply the same business day
- Sites
- A depot and a food production site
- Checked
- Six areas, each scored out of 4
- Scores
- 83% and 96%
- After
- Every gap listed with its fix
The depot: 83%, meeting standard
Inspected on 20 May 2026. The workshop floor and the bins scored excellent. Amenities, toilets, walkways and offices scored good, each with a note: marks on walls and doors, the edges near the doors to scrub, a floor scrub for the rear office, and the cleaners' room scrubbed weekly. The toilets were noted as a big improvement on the inspection before.
The food production site: 96%, above expectations
Inspected on 12 May 2026. Five of the six areas scored excellent. The one note was to clean the trays attached to the ovens and water baths. Office and kitchen staff gave positive feedback, and an order form was added to the cleaners' room so supplies are reordered before they run out.
Why it's written down
A score with notes gives the site manager something to check against next time, and gives whoever cleans the site the exact list. A walk-past that ends in "looks fine" gives neither.
Photos on this page are from JC jobs, not necessarily this site.
Want your site scored like this?
We'll do your induction, walk the floor, the amenities and the offices, then send the written scope with the price, and inspections on a set schedule.
- 4.9 from 59 Google reviews
- A written scope before any work starts
- Every visit recorded: times, tasks and photos
- ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 certified · IICRC Certified Firm
- Rather talk? (08) 6385 6664